Book Corner 2019.21

sense

The Annotated Sense & Sensibility by Jane Austen

The five stars are for Jane, not for the annotator. I bought this for my Kindle for one of those “need reading now” situations.  Now I realize that Harvard University Press also has an annotated edition with a different editor which is probably the one I really wanted.  Also, a book with what appear to be beautiful illustrations like this is really one you want in hardcover, not a screen.  Finally, footnotes are something I’ve now thoroughly learned are things you really want to see on a physical page as well.  The reading experience on Kindle was greatly marred by having to click footnotes – I am an old-school typist who hates “clicking” in general, persnickety clicking in particular, like when you have to cursor your mouse right in the middle of a tiny checkbox; or, in this case, position your fat fingertip precisely on the little superscript, else find yourself thrown onto the next page instead of into the footnote.  That happened to me more than 50% of the time in the beginning, I’d say only a little less than 50% by the time I’d trained myself as best I could to hit the superscript.  And the nasty icing on the cake, and the reason I am not thrilled with this annotated edition – half the footnotes are mere definitions of words and expressions that are pretty damn obvious to someone with more than an eighth-grade education.  Once I’d clicked (with difficulty) a footnote on the word “amusing” which, I swear, did nothing more than define “amusing” as “entertaining” – then I had to train myself to identify which footnotes were most likely to be mere, stupid definitions vs. those which were likely to actually enrich my reading experience.  End of the sentence was more likely to be worthwhile; middle of the sentence, on a word more than four letters long, was more likely to be a stupid definition.

Back to Jane! The inspiration for this purchase was that I’d recently read Reading Jane Austen which made me want to re-read Jane Austen.  Even with all my complaints, annotations make a re-read much more fun.  And re-reads of excellent, beloved books always bring some new discovery, feeling, or interpretation.  I was surprised this time at how much I loved Marianne.  Most touchingly, I loved her love for her sister.  She makes clear upon first making Edward’s acquaintance that he is not her cup of tea; but once she understands that her sister loves him, she practically loves him even more on her behalf.  When he pops in for a visit, she’s almost more thrilled than Elinor – well, she is more thrilled than Elinor, because the visit is complicated, to say the least, by the presence of Elinor’s rival; but she is SO loving towards Edward, and genuinely happy to have her sister’s love interest there, on Elinor’s behalf, it’s just adorable and endearing.

I reconcile myself a bit more to her ending, too, which I used to feel was a disservice to her, fobbing her off on an old Colonel who wore flannel waistcoats who was totally contrary to all her predilections… but I’ve decided to take heart in the phrase “Marianne could not love by halves.” Once she had found herself developing a fondness towards Colonel Brandon, it could not help but develop into full-fledged love, I’m sure.

 

More Seattle Arboretum

021.jpg

I think that one’s a magnolia.

Seattle BTW was a long weekend to visit Aunt Alice.  She’s much the same as last time I saw her.  She’s non-verbal, but looked at me deeply when I spoke.

It was a coincidence that Aunt Lou died at the same time that I was scheduled to visit Aunt Alice.  I changed my return flight to hit the funeral in Virginia.

 

Rhododendrons (Right?)

022.jpg

This was at the Arboretum in Seattle this past weekend.  I *think* this is a rhododendron, though there’s a chance it could be an azalea; I’m not good at identifying flowering plants.  We basically saw rhododendrons, azaleas, magnolias, and cherry trees.  Larry and I went walking early Sunday morning.  Like most places, it seems, Seattle is much further along in the springtime thing than Vermont.

 

Grieving

I used to think grieving was just about missing someone.

Or if a person’s life was cut short prematurely, about being upset about that, kind of on their behalf.

So, in my usual dense way, I didn’t have much patience for people making a big deal about somebody old dying that they had never seen fit to even mention before.

Now I realize that grieving is also about stories ending.  That’s the best way I can put it.  When I look at pictures of John, Barbara, Uncle Bill, and Aunt Lou, young and in their prime, I feel sad for their stories being over.

I wasn’t “close” with Aunt Lou, probably never spoke with her over the past 20 years other than the time she came to my wedding and the time she came to Barbara’s funeral.

Our families got together only once or twice a year when I was a child.  So I wasn’t this big part of her “story”, but I was part of it.  I was her sister’s daughter.  I knew her and her story and I was in it.

I look at pictures of their youth, and I know how it turns out.  There’s something just so sad about that.

Maybe it’s like a novel where they put this epilogue and tell you how everyone dies. That’s always kind of annoying, isn’t it?

 

023

 

 

Book Corner 2019.20

1616204214_01__SX142_SY224_SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg

Real Food/Fake Food by Larry Olmsted

A defense of truth in foodie advertising.

First off, Parmigiano-Reggiano cheese, a delicious hard grating (and snacking!) cheese, unlike any other to hear him tell it.  I’m all for Parmigiano-Reggiano.  But Grana Padano has all the same characteristics.  I’m more familiar with the latter than the former, so maybe I need to go find some P-R and be transported into ecstasies by what I’ve been missing; but I have to say I’ve had damn good G. P.  He talks about G. P. being passed off as parmesan, and I’m all for truth in labeling and advertising; but he never stakes any claims as to why G. P. is such a worse thing.

And a confession here.  That “cardboard” powder that comes in the shakeable green can?  It ain’t Parmigiano-Reggiano or even lousy Grana Padano or even, I guess, cheese.  But (whisper) I kind of like it?  It has its place?  It’s an easily shakeable umami I can put on my pasta.  Shaved hard cheese is delicious, but it’s not the same thing, is it?  I like the grated stuff.  Grew up with it.

Onward… parma ham – I’m not familiar enough with it to comment.  Fish labeled as the wrong species – again, I don’t want things mislabeled.  But he doesn’t really sufficiently go into why the species is so important.

Olive oil – a very informative chapter.  And I’ve been destroying my bottle of super-authentic olive oil that I carted personally all the way from Italy, by keeping it next to the toaster-oven – DOH!  But sigh, to hear the experts tell it, we have to buy oils and spices and grains in practically single-serving sizes since they allegedly become inedible so quickly.

Truffle oil, another informative section – basically, don’t.  Just don’t.

Kobe beef…  You haven’t had it.  There are only three places in America serving the real deal.  Meanwhile, we have a lot of “wagyu” beef floating around… this is nominally the same species as the cows used in Japan to make Kobe beef, but that doesn’t make it Kobe beef, or good, or anything, really.  Anyway, Kobe beef doesn’t sound like something I want.  The way it’s described reminds me of a croissant – fat, fat, fat, and just enough lean [muscle/flour] to keep the structure together and not just be a stick of fat.  Meh.

Champagne – I don’t even like.  Scotch – even less so.  More about cheese.  And wine – provenances and varietals.  Useful info, like what percentage of a varietal is needed in the U.S.A. to use the name of the varietal in the label (used to be 51%, now it’s much higher)…

Don’t let my negativity fool you, the book was A.O.K. with lots of info; I guess just a few too many sections about foodstuffs I’m not interested in.

Book Corner 2019.18

0544557239_01__SX142_SY224_SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg

Life Admin by Elizabeth Emens

From what I could see, she didn’t learn to do less, do better, or live more.  All I got was a lot of complaining.  And enough about the Flexible Spending Account already.  Apparently I am a weird mash-up of the “Admin Denier” and the “Admin Super-Doer.”  I am “on top of things” while at the same time am convinced that IT’S JUST NOT THAT IMPORTANT.