Book Corner 2026.12

by J. R. R. Tolkien

(Re-read)

“‘I wish it need not have happened in my time’, said Frodo.
‘So do I,’ said Gandalf. ‘and so do all who live to see such times. But that is not for them to decide. All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us.'”

“‘He deserves death.’
‘Deserves it! I daresay he does. And some that die deserve life. Can you give it to them?'”

“He that breaks a thing to find out what it is has left the path of wisdom.”

This book is a tremendous ode to love of nature… love of home… love of the agrarian… and a spirituality of the earth and beyond.

And an adventure story. This is at least my third read, and I think I saw the Peter Jackson movies twice. The movies have enhanced my ability to visualize the action scenes of the book – I’m not good following action, as a rule. But the memory of the movie’s depiction of Gandalf’s capture by the Balrog – his last words, “Fly, you fools!!” – made the scene live for me.

Book Corner 2026.11

by Lionel Shriver


Lionel Shriver, you have really let me down. This book is really bad. The dialogue is horrible; the protagonist is an ugly character. From what I’d read, I thought this book was supposed to be “balanced.” It’s all nativism, and scheming scamming illegal immigrants. I appreciate your eagerness to take on the tough issues nobody wants to touch, but you’re apparently not always up to the task.

Book Corner 2026.9

by Lionel Shriver

I am a really big Lionel Shriver fan. I’ve liked some of her books more than others. But I love her for being a High Concept author. Here’s an alternative unfolding of history where it’s become verboten to believe that there are any differences in cognitive ability among anyone. Everyone is as smart as everyone else; it’s called the Mental Parity movement, and to say words like “dumb” or “stupid” is as unimaginable as our using the “n-word” is here and now.

You can almost buy that it’s possible. But things go so far in this alt-universe as to allow unqualified people to be tree surgeons and even people surgeons. Naturally, it doesn’t go well.

The protagonist of MANIA is Pearson, a woman with three kids; the older two are “smart”, whereas the younger one, Lucy, is definitely different. The older two were conceived via artificial insemination and have a father with a genius IQ. Lucy is the biological daughter of Pearson’s partner Wade. Wade’s wonderful and easy-going and a manual laborer, not a brainiac kind of guy; and Lucy, being an ordinary little girl, suffers for not being seriously taught anything in school because of the Mental Parity movement.

Pearson’s obvious favoring of the older kids and outright dislike of Lucy (“Lucy bored me”) was never resolved and hard to take. Look, saying that you kid is literally dumb, in a serious way, within her earshot, is Bad even in real life; it’s not a crazy Mental Parity thing to say so. Of course the kid hated her and the older siblings, and acted out.

And Wade never took issue with this? I never got any feeling of actual love among any of these family members, come to think of it.

There’s a lot more going on in the book. Worth reading.

Book Corner 2026.5

by Erik Larson

Not really my kind of book (a book club pick). It was hard to follow without zoning out. By page 422, I’m like, “Bomb the fort already!!!”

The indignation of the South at Lincoln’s election & the North’s attitude towards slavery and southerners “way of life”, and their sense of “honor”, reminds me of MAGA folks today. They feel looked down on.

Book Corner 2026.3-4

by Pamela Smith Hill

Pamela Hill Smith is both a true scholar and a true fan of Laura Ingalls Wilder; here she provides a book-by-book critique of Wilder’s skill as a novelist for kids & young adults (& young adults at heart).

Thoughts:
– Was surprised to learn that the book CADDIE WOODLAWN came out contemporaneously with the Little House series. I hated CADDIE WOODLAWN when I was young! You’d think, being a Little House Nut, I’d devour everything similar about the time period; but to me, Little House was the bible. Little House was HOW IT WAS. Any different experiences were just – “all wrong”, the way Laura felt about her daughter’s novelization of her family’s struggles.

– I didn’t share Hill’s satisfaction with the Little House ending when I was an 11-year-old finishing up the series. I never warmed to Almanzo. I didn’t feel he was good enough for our Laura. When he was first driving her home from the teaching gig, she explicitly didn’t want to go out with him. Then she only started going sledding with him because she was jealous of everyone else out having fun. I never got the sense of her falling in love with him; it just seemed she ended up with him because he was around.

I combined this with a re-reading of The First Four Years, which, I agree with Hill, should never have been marketed as part of the ‘Little House’ series. I’m glad it was published; it’s just different and not part of the set.

Book Corner 2026.2

by Marie Kondo and Yuko Uramoto

It’s the life-changing magic of tidying up – in manga form!!! Adorable manga-fairy Marie Kondo helps the protagonist tidy according to the KonMarie method. Organize by category! Not by room! Storage is not the answer! You must discard! Thank all your possessions before letting them go. Keep your remaining possessions tidy so they can be happy and ready to serve you!